|
Mars in Transit:
Beware of What You Want for You
Will Get It
by Jessica Murray
Published in Astrology Considerations, February 2006
All of us who read
charts have at some point been spooked by transits of Mars. It is perhaps
the most closely watched and most cursorily interpreted planet in transit
astrology. Not known for subtlety, Mars' transits can be a revelation when
they trigger more inscrutable underlying chart patterns, because with Mars
something usually happens; something that we can point to. But considered
alone, the very obviousness of Mars tempts us to remain on the level of
symptom rather than meaning.
Mars' deeper
significance is as available as any other planet's; but with Mars it is
easier to miss. More likely than any other celestial indicator to coincide
with actual events, Mars is notorious for setting off happenings and
signifying outside forces. The stage set for Mars' action is often
material reality, where most of our attention is focused most of the time.
Mars appeals to our identification with the earth-plane, teaching its
lessons through occurrences that appear to be directed at us rather than
from us. I believe this has something to do with why Mars is the planet
for which we are the least likely to take personal and spiritual
responsibility.
The trouble is, without
committing ourselves to the fuller meaning of transiting Mars, we will
miss what he is trying to teach.
For most of us, outer
events have a very different quality than inner events. They seem more
real. I find this is so even in the case of astrologers whose take on
planetary symbolism otherwise disdains the literal. Outer events, unlike
inner events, are easier for us to chalk up to forces that can be
disavowed.
Throughout the last
couple of millennia, during which astrology has been used more often for
fortune-telling than as a consciousness tool, the goal in mapping transits
of Mars has been to avoid "malefic" events; to outwit the planet as if it
was cooking up a fiendish plot against us, which advance notice would
allow us to thwart. These days, transits are increasingly understood in
terms of psychic projection, and the planet-as-malevolent-god school of
interpretation is losing ground. And yet, by and large, Mars is still seen
as an outside agitator in "traditional" astrology.
1
The view of a Mars
transit as something nasty to outmanoeuvre is based on the assumption that
the internal and the external realms of life are separate and, sometimes,
mutually antagonistic. If we encounter a reckless driver on the highway
under a Mars transit, we tend to see it as an unlucky event that has
little to do with us: mean old Mars just made it happen by passing over
our chart. On the face of things, it is easier to see it this way.
Certainly the prevailing societal worldview would encourage us to see it
this way. As the bumperstickers say, shit happens.
But if, as astrologers,
we value theoretical consistency, we would do well to consider what our
fundamental beliefs are about how transits work, and whether we are
applying these principles in some instances and not in others. Though one
hears again and again that "there is no such thing as an accident",
particularly from aficionados of astrology, transits of Mars seem to
strain the faith. Somehow Mars is felt to be the exception to the
I-create-my-own-reality rule.
It is not surprising
that this would be so, given the assumptions of mechanistic materialism
which we have, as Westerners, absorbed through schooling and cultural
paradigm. An unquestioned axiom of the non-metaphysical model of reality
is that the recipient of an "accident" has no agency at all in the event.
We who read charts use the principle of synchronicity to explain transits
to non-astrologers, but we have been trained, like everybody else, to
perceive existence in terms of Newtonian law; and though we aspire to
venture beyond causality, cultural assumptions die hard. So it is that at
first glance, accidents, illnesses and arguments look like effects of
which Mars seems to be the cause; and the native is still stuck in the
role of hapless victim.
In the case of disasters
like earthquakes or criminal attacks (where we expect to see other chart
factors active, notably the outer planets; not just Mars), positing that
the native is a participant in the action becomes especially problematic.
For an astrologer to chalk up traumas like these to the native's agency is
to leave herself open to the charge of blaming-the-victim. Surely, it is
argued, such phenomena are totally unrelated to the volition of the
native. To suggest that anyone would have or could have "chosen" an
incident involving terrible harm to the self seems an outrageous insult to
the native's injury.
The confusion here has
to do with the limitations of language, as well as a lack of shared
assumptions between the conventional and metaphysical ways of
understanding volition. The question is: Which level of self is being seen
as doing the "choosing"? As Jung postulated, each of us has a self (a
conscious ego-identity); and a Self (a spiritual trans-egoic identity),
which is not conscious, and not even unconscious, but Superconscious. Most
modern astrologers maintain that this Self, which we could call the soul
identity, has its own mysterious karmic purposes, and can indeed be said
to "choose" whatever happens to it.
The stumbling block for
many in accepting this view seems to be the notion of blame. I believe an
unconscious logic is at work here, by which we falsely reason that the
repugnant event must be either the planets' fault or our own fault; the
less painful being to confer upon the planets the role of villain. But at
these levels of inquiry, there is no such thing as blame. The Higher Self
does not punish us; the planets, mere timing devices, do not punish us.
Blame is a human conceit.
From a karmic
point of view, passing a Mars event off as the caprice of Fate stymies
growth because it denies our soul's intention to learn something from the
transit. From a pragmatic point of view, it increases the likelihood that
we will have an unpleasant experience.
The psychospiritual approach to astrology would explain the association of
Mars with fights, accidents and illnesses by proposing that sometimes the
native attracts these events by building up inner agitation, suppressing
volatile feelings or incompletely expressing his or her individuality. Of
Mars square natal Uranus, Rob Hand writes: "An accident can be the result
of frustrated ego energies transmuted into destructive powers."2
If we have been letting
off steam appropriately throughout the previous phases of the Mars cycle,
we're going to have an easier time of it. And even if we have not, by
cultivating a serious awareness of the transit we can and will change our
experience of it. If a Mars event-- for example, an encounter with an
aggressive person-- is viewed as an extension of our own Will, which wants
to give us a chance to find out how we use our force, and how
authentically we assert ourselves, then we will probably view the
challenge as a case of the environment playing along with us, offering up
a fair and timely test of our courage and directness.
Mars crossing the
Descendant, for example, is especially likely to coincide with an opponent
coming forward, but only because it is time for the native to work on how
to meet opposition. A person who is afraid of conflict is more likely to
fear such a confrontation, and thus to overreact or under react, either of
which will probably provoke more conflict (at the time, or when Mars makes
its next hard aspect). Contrast this with the person encountering the
transit without fear of conflict. He or she would meet the antagonist with
the understanding that it is time to refine her/his skills of
self-assertion. Not only would this get the native closer to the true
teaching the higher self had intended, but as a perk, it would bestow upon
the encounter a more constructive result. Recognizing the external as a
mirror of the internal, we are more able to creatively respond, rather
than react, even to situations that are tense and alarming.
The whole point of
reading one's transits, of course, is to know about the lesson ahead of
time, so as to be able to ready oneself with a posture or an activity that
creatively suits the symbolism. If we were to schedule a game of tennis,
for example, to coincide with that Mars/Descendant conjunction, the
requisite opposition could be taken care of while having fun at the same
time.
Transits happen because it is simply time for us to learn something. If a
man literally passes through your life on the dates marked by the transit,
it is to allow you to interface with whatever qualities you perceive to be
masculine. The lesson may be about what to cultivate or what to avoid in
the playing out of masculine energies. If you come across a snarling dog
on the day the transit is peaking, consider the symbolism. Either by role
modelling or default, Mars coming at you from the outside world is there
to reflect something back to you about the state of your own animus. If we
see it this way, we keep the power with ourselves. If we see the Mars
event as the whimsy of the gods, we give the power away.
Each of the planets has its own way of waking us up to ourselves,
targeting whatever part of our psychic musculature needs flexing. All
planet-timed lessons are generated by the soul-identified Self in order to
show something to the ego-identified self, so that we may get to know who
we really are. The thing that makes Mars such a scene-stealer among
transits must be that the red planet, immediate as a whack on the head, is
just that much better at getting our attention. And as with a headache, we
can either race around trying to find a pill to make the feeling go away,
or we can ask ourselves where the pain is coming from, and why it is
happening now.
1 I apply quotation marks here
because, as in the case of the phrase "traditional medicine", what is
called traditional depends upon which tradition one is referring to, and
how far back historically one is willing to look. There have always been
astrological Mystery Schools, wherein initiates used celestial cycles to
understand the nature of the self and the divine, rather than to play
chicken with a seemingly arbitrary Fate. The spiritual use of astrology,
which dates back much earlier than the medieval superstition-based models
by which astrology is largely known today, may have been underground
during much of recorded history, but it was never extinguished. Today's
humanistic astrology is an outgrowth of this tradition.
2 Planets in Transit,
ParaResearch 1976, p.248
© Copyright 2009 Jessica
Murray. All Rights reserved
Visit Jessica's site -
MotherSky for more articles.
Jessica Murray has practiced humanistic
astrology in San Francisco for thirty years. A widely published essayist
and a graduate of Brown University where she studied traditional
psychology, Jessica offers a full range of astrological readings by phone
or in person, in a professional, comfortable setting complete with a pot
of fine tea. |